205
Essays on Infinite Lifespans
Eric S. Rabkin
It is for the same reason that Olaf Stapledon in Star Maker
praises not swarming hive minds that obliterate the indi-
vidual but the intricate symbiosis [19, pg. 255] represented
by a perfect marriage, by that prized atom of community
[19 pg. 257] in which two may depend upon each other and
procreate but in which each maintains essential individual-
ity, and risks individual death.
Against this view, we have Blood Music, in which Greg Bear
lets loose a plague of intelligent leukocytes and the world
is transformed, all of us ultimately parts of a planetary hive
mind. The protagonist says, if I die here, now, theres hun-
dreds of others tuned in to me, ready to become me, and I
dont die at all. I just lose this particular me [
] it becomes
impossible to die [20 pg. 197]. Bears protagonist may believe
that, but identical twins do not: no matter the duplication
of information in another copy, the death of the individual
as contemplated by that individual is death indeed. And the
capacity to die is a great, self-defining freedom, the ultimate
existential freedom according to Sartre and Camus and the
very ground of conflict between the individual and the state,
as seen in the hospitalized, limbless combat victim in Dalton
Trumbos Johnny Got His Gun [21], in Brian Clarks tube-fed
paraplegic in Whose Life Is It Anyway? [22], and in D-503,
the protagonist of Eugene Zamiatins We, after the splinter
[of imagination] has been taken out of [his] head and he is
reduced to a permanent, idiot grin, for Reason must prevail
[23, pg. 217218]. This happy state of inevitable obedience
is the ultimate Eden, and the splinter removed from D-503 is
the thorn of the plant Gilgamesh sought, its prickle remind-
ing us that we are alive as individuals only when we are subject
to death.
It is said that when Michelangelo completed the ideal-
ized Medici tombs ordered by Pope Clement VII someone
remarked on an absence of realism. Who will care, the great